|
|
|
stalking the mirage of the 'me'
a
shortcut to non-separation
Physics in general, and quantum theory in particular, began as the study
of objective reality, i.e., a reality that exists whether or not it is
being observed. Classical physics had no problem with this approach.
When classical physics proved inadequate to the task of explaining the
results of certain experiments, quantum theory arose. It was
spectacularly successful in explaining these results and many more,
too. Then a few physicists began to ask, is this all that quantum
theory means--the explanation of experimental results? Does it have any
ontological value, i.e., can it tell us what objective reality ‘is’, not
just what it ‘does’? This is what an ‘interpretation’ of quantum theory
is supposed to do, to describe what objective reality is. So a few
physicists worked very hard to come up with an interpretation in terms
of an objective reality....and failed. But the failure was that there
were too many contenders, not too few, and there was no way to determine
which one, if any, was correct. Furthermore, most of them pretend that
the quantum wavefunction, which is a probability wave rather than a
physical wave, is an objectively real object rather than being simply
the mathematical formula that it is.
However, rather than this being cause for despair, it actually can
liberate us from the prison of objective reality. As long as we believe
that objects are real, we will find it difficult to escape the belief
that we are objects, and consequently to feel separate from all other
objects. The failure of physicists to find an objective interpretation
of quantum theory has the potential to liberate us from this fatal
belief in separation.
So now that we don't have to believe in the existence of separation,
what is left? We are free to believe in the absence of separation. Better still, we don't have to leave it to mere belief, we can ‘see’
that there is no separation. This is where the teaching of nonduality comes in. There are many statements of nonduality,
e.g., consciousness is all there is, love is all there is, there are not
two, there is only oneness, etc. These are useful to begin with
but the statements themselves don't take us very far. To believe
the statements is to make nonduality into a religion rather than
accepting it as a teaching. Instead of belief, what is necessary
is a clear, direct seeing of truth.
The
essence of direct seeing is to see that there is no separate me. If
there is no separate me, there is no separation.
How do
we see that there is no me? Simply speaking, we just look for the me. If we don't find it, then we look for what-it-is that sees that there is
no me. We might think that then is the true me. In that case, we just
take another step back and look for what-it-is that sees that. We might
think that we will have to keep on stepping back forever but that proves
not to be the case. Once we see that there is no me, the next step, the
step of seeing the witness of no-me, is likely to be the last one
because the seeing of the witness likely dissolves the witness, and then
there is only pure awareness.
What
if we find a me in the first step? The process is the same as above. We step back and see what-it-is that sees the me. If we find the
witness of the me, we take another step back and see what-it-is that
sees the witness of the me. That seeing will likely dissolve the
witness, leaving pure awareness.
Even
if we can find no me and no witness of no-me, we might still feel that
our awareness is confined to the skull. In that case, we look for
what-it-is that sees that awareness is confined to the skull. If we see
an awareness that is confined to the skull, we immediately see that what
seems to be confined awareness cannot be true awareness. Again, as we
step back and look for what sees this, we might find a witness of
no-confined- awareness. Once again, we step back to see what-it-is that
sees the witness. In so doing, the witness again dissolves into pure
awareness.
Once
we see that there is no me, no witness of no-me, and no-confinement, all
separation dissolves. This seeing might have to be repeated many times
for it to be a continuing awareness of no separation. It is very
helpful to realize that both the apparent me and apparent confinement
are just arisings. Since all arisings rapidly come and go, the me and
confinement are never permanent, even for a short time. There are many
times when there is no me and no confinement but we are not aware of it
because we are not at the moment suffering from separation. Consequently, we can save our practice times for the times that we are
suffering.
~ Stanley Sobottka
Source:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OAStudyGroup/
~
course in consciousness
dialogue in consciousness
http://faculty.virginia.edu/consciousness/
|
|
advaita
awakening
course in consciousness
dialogue in consciousness
david bohm
education
albert einstein
meditation
nisargadatta maharaj
nondual
perspectives
the eyeless eye
seeing without shadows
subtle sideways
seeing
the wonder of wonder
wei wu wei
what is
this 'nonduality'?
|